Quality Concerns in Indian Doctoral Research
Analyzing the Impact of Descriptive Studies and Predatory Publishing in Humanities and Social Sciences
Author: Mr. Khritish Swargiary
Email: khritish@teachers.org
Abstract
This study examines the critical challenges facing doctoral research in humanities and social sciences within the Indian academic landscape. Through comprehensive analysis of existing literature and empirical evidence, the research identifies three major concerns: the prevalence of descriptive research lacking theoretical depth, the proliferation of predatory journal publications, and systemic barriers to publishing in reputable journals. The findings reveal that 88% of journals in the University Grants Commission's approved list were deemed predatory, with India contributing to 27% of global predatory journal publishers. Additionally, the study highlights how institutional pressures for publication quantity over quality, combined with inadequate research training and limited resources, compromise research integrity and societal impact. The research concludes that systematic reforms in academic evaluation metrics, enhanced research training, and stronger quality control measures are essential to elevate the standard of doctoral research in India.
Keywords: Doctoral Research Quality, Predatory Publishing, Academic Integrity, Research Methodology, Social Sciences Research, Higher Education Policy.
INTRODUCTION
The pursuit of doctoral research in the humanities and social sciences is fundamental to the intellectual and societal development of any nation. These disciplines encompass a wide range of areas, including history, sociology, political science, economics, literature, and philosophy, which collectively contribute to the understanding of complex human behaviors, cultural dynamics, and societal structures. Globally, research in these fields has been pivotal in influencing policies, fostering cultural appreciation, and addressing critical social challenges. In the Indian context, the significance of such research is particularly high, given the country’s diversity in language, culture, and socio-economic conditions. However, there is growing concern over the quality and impact of PhD research in the humanities and social sciences in India.
The Importance of Doctoral Research Doctoral research serves as the backbone of knowledge creation, offering insights and innovations that address societal needs and intellectual curiosities. Humanities and social sciences, in particular, play a crucial role in fostering critical thinking, ethical understanding, and cultural awareness, which are essential for holistic societal growth. Scholars in these fields are expected to engage in deep theoretical exploration and practical application of their findings to contribute meaningfully to societal advancement. When executed rigorously, such research has the potential to shape policies, guide developmental agendas, and provide solutions to pressing social issues, ranging from inequality and education to governance and cultural preservation.
Concerns About Research Quality In India, however, the efficacy of doctoral research in these fields has come under scrutiny. Critics argue that much of the work produced by PhD scholars is descriptive in nature, offering basic summaries or surveys without delving into deeper analytical or theoretical frameworks (Prasad, 2018). This issue is not merely an academic concern but a societal one, as the lack of rigorous, solution-oriented research limits the ability of these scholars to address ground realities and make impactful contributions. For instance, many doctoral theses focus on repetitive and narrowly scoped topics that fail to engage with broader, more complex societal challenges (Lakhotia, 2017).
The Issue of Practical Applicability Another significant critique is the lack of practical applicability of the research conducted. Doctoral studies in the humanities and social sciences are often criticized for being disconnected from the realities they aim to address. Scholars may undertake research projects that are theoretically rich but lack actionable insights or policy relevance. This gap between academic output and societal application is particularly problematic in a country like India, where the need for evidence-based interventions and informed policy-making is acute. For example, research on issues such as caste inequality, gender disparities, and rural development often remains confined to theoretical discussions, with little effort to translate findings into actionable recommendations (Press Trust of India, 2016).
Dubious Publishing Practices A troubling trend exacerbating the problem is the prevalence of predatory and cloned journals in India. Many PhD scholars, driven by institutional pressures to publish for career advancement, resort to publishing in journals that lack credible peer review and rigorous editorial standards. A study by Prasad (2018) revealed that a staggering 88% of the journals in the University Grants Commission’s (UGC) approved list were deemed predatory. These journals often accept substandard papers without thorough scrutiny, undermining the quality and credibility of academic research. Moreover, India has emerged as a significant contributor to such journals, with approximately 27% of global predatory journal publishers operating from the country (Press Trust of India, 2017).
Implications for Societal Development The implications of these issues are profound. The emphasis on descriptive research, coupled with the inclination towards dubious publishing avenues, limits the potential for Indian humanities and social sciences scholars to influence policy-making or contribute to societal progress. Additionally, the global academic community may view Indian research outputs with skepticism, further marginalizing Indian scholars in the international arena (Prasad, 2015). The disconnect between academic research and societal needs also means that critical issues such as poverty alleviation, education reform, and social justice remain inadequately addressed.
Scope of This Paper Given these challenges, this paper aims to critically assess the state of PhD research in the humanities and social sciences in India. By examining empirical evidence, it seeks to understand the root causes of these issues and explore potential strategies for enhancing the quality, relevance, and impact of doctoral research in these disciplines. Ultimately, the goal is to contribute to the ongoing discourse on improving academic standards and aligning research outputs with societal needs.
PREVALENCE OF DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH
A significant critique of PhD research in India is its predominantly descriptive nature. Studies have indicated that scholars often engage in survey-based research without advancing theoretical frameworks or offering innovative solutions to existing problems. This trend results in a body of work that, while informative, may lack the depth and analytical rigor necessary to drive meaningful societal change.
The predominance of descriptive research in Indian PhD programs has been a subject of critical analysis among scholars and educators. This trend, characterized by a focus on survey-based studies that often lack robust theoretical frameworks or innovative problem-solving approaches, has implications for the academic rigor and societal impact of doctoral research in the country.
Nature of Descriptive Research in Indian PhD Programs Descriptive research primarily involves the systematic collection and presentation of data to describe phenomena as they exist. In the context of Indian PhD programs, this approach often manifests through extensive surveys and data collection efforts that aim to capture the current state of affairs within a particular domain. While such studies provide valuable insights into existing conditions, they may not delve deeper into the underlying causes or propose innovative solutions to identified problems.
Lack of Theoretical Frameworks and Innovation A significant critique of this descriptive focus is the insufficient emphasis on developing and applying theoretical frameworks that can guide research towards addressing complex issues. The absence of such frameworks may result in studies that are informative but lack the analytical depth required to contribute meaningfully to academic discourse or societal advancement. Furthermore, without a focus on innovation, research may fail to propose novel solutions or approaches, thereby limiting its practical applicability and impact.
Implications for Societal Change The reliance on descriptive research has broader implications for societal development. Research that does not engage in critical analysis or propose innovative solutions may fall short in addressing pressing societal challenges. For instance, studies have highlighted the need for innovative learning paths to optimize the training of professionals in technology-driven environments, emphasizing the importance of moving beyond descriptive analyses to foster practical solutions (Das & Singha, 2024).
Recent Initiatives and Examples Despite these critiques, there are emerging examples of research initiatives in India that strive to move beyond descriptive methodologies. For instance, the Department of Design at the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati has engaged in research that combines descriptive studies with theoretical analysis and practical applications. Research areas such as "Comparative Visual Study of Traditional & Contemporary Folk Paintings and their Applications in Transmedia" demonstrate an integration of descriptive research with innovative applications, contributing to both academic knowledge and practical design solutions (IIT Guwahati, 2024).
While descriptive research provides a foundational understanding of various phenomena, the advancement of PhD research in India necessitates a shift towards incorporating robust theoretical frameworks and fostering innovation. Such a transition is essential to enhance the analytical rigor of doctoral studies and to ensure that research outcomes contribute effectively to societal progress.
PUBLICATION IN PREDATORY JOURNALS
The issue of predatory publishing is particularly pronounced in India. A study by The Hindu revealed that 88% of journals in the University Grants Commission's (UGC) approved list were predatory in nature (The Hindu). These journals often lack proper peer-review mechanisms, allowing substandard research to be disseminated. Furthermore, India has been identified as a leading contributor to such journals, with 27% of predatory journal publishers based in the country (India Today).
The proliferation of predatory journals poses a significant challenge to the integrity of academic publishing, particularly in India. These journals, which prioritize profit over scholarly rigor, often bypass standard peer-review processes, leading to the dissemination of subpar research. A comprehensive study conducted by Patwardhan et al. (2018) critically analyzed the University Grants Commission's (UGC) approved list of journals and found that a staggering 88% of the 1,009 journals examined were predatory in nature. This finding underscores the pervasive nature of such publications within India's academic landscape.
Lack of Peer Review and Quality Control Predatory journals typically lack robust peer-review mechanisms, allowing for the publication of research without adequate scrutiny. This absence of quality control results in the dissemination of unverified and often flawed studies, which can mislead other researchers and policymakers. The Indian academic community has been particularly susceptible to these practices, with many scholars inadvertently submitting their work to these journals, lured by promises of rapid publication and broad dissemination.
India's Predominant Role in Predatory Publishing India has been identified as a leading contributor to the global predatory publishing industry. A study published in BMC Medicine revealed that 27% of predatory journal publishers are based in India, and about 35% of authors in such journals are affiliated with Indian institutions (Shen & Björk, 2015). This prevalence is attributed to the "publish or perish" culture prevalent in academia, where the quantity of publications is often emphasized over quality, pressuring researchers to seek out any available publication avenue, including predatory journals.
Implications for Academic Integrity The widespread publication in predatory journals has severe implications for academic integrity. It undermines the credibility of genuine research, dilutes the quality of academic discourse, and can lead to the propagation of misinformation. Moreover, it tarnishes the reputation of institutions and scholars associated with such publications, potentially affecting funding opportunities and academic collaborations.
UGC's Response and Recommendations In response to the growing concerns over predatory publishing, the UGC has taken steps to address the issue. In 2019, the UGC issued a directive advising the academic community to avoid publication in predatory or dubious journals and to refrain from participating in predatory conferences (NDTV, 2019). The Commission emphasized that publications in such journals should not be considered for academic credit in selections, promotions, or performance appraisals. Additionally, the UGC established the Consortium for Academic and Research Ethics (CARE) to identify and maintain a reference list of quality journals across disciplines, aiming to promote academic integrity and curb unethical publication practices.
The issue of predatory publishing is a significant concern in India's academic environment. The high prevalence of such journals within the UGC's approved list highlights the need for stringent quality control measures and increased awareness among researchers. By prioritizing quality over quantity in research publications and adhering to ethical publishing practices, the academic community can work towards preserving the integrity of scholarly communication.
IMPACT ON RESEARCH QUALITY AND SOCIETAL CHANGE
The inclination towards publishing in predatory journals has detrimental effects on the quality of research. Without rigorous peer review, the validity and reliability of findings are questionable. Consequently, the potential for research to inform policy or contribute to societal advancement is significantly undermined. Moreover, the emphasis on quantity over quality, driven by academic performance indicators, exacerbates this issue
Nature
Impact on Research Quality and Societal Change The proliferation of predatory journals and the increasing inclination towards publishing in them have profoundly detrimental impacts on the quality of research and its ability to drive meaningful societal change. The absence of rigorous peer-review mechanisms, a hallmark of legitimate scholarly publishing, results in the publication of studies with questionable validity and reliability. Consequently, the trustworthiness of the research is compromised, which has far-reaching implications for the scientific community and society at large.
Undermining Research Integrity Predatory journals bypass the rigorous editorial and peer-review standards that characterize reputable journals (Beall, 2017). Without these critical vetting processes, flawed methodologies, biased interpretations, and unsubstantiated claims are often published as legitimate science. This erosion of research integrity undermines the foundational principles of scientific inquiry, which are predicated on transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy (Smolčić, 2014).
For instance, a study by Shen and Björk (2015) estimated that over 400,000 articles were published in predatory journals in 2014 alone, representing a significant proportion of global academic output. These numbers reflect a growing trend of academics prioritizing quantity over quality, primarily driven by the "publish or perish" culture that dominates academia. As such, the lack of reliable data emerging from predatory publications can mislead subsequent research efforts, leading to wasted resources and efforts.
Implications for Policy and Practice The impact of low-quality research extends beyond academia into policymaking and societal practices. Governments, non-governmental organizations, and industries rely heavily on academic research to inform their decisions. However, when these decisions are based on flawed or unreliable studies, the consequences can be dire (Strielkowski, 2020). For instance, in the field of medicine, erroneous findings published in predatory journals could lead to the approval of ineffective or harmful treatments, thereby endangering public health (Moher et al., 2017).
Furthermore, research that lacks credibility fails to address critical societal challenges effectively. For example, studies aimed at addressing climate change or social inequalities must be underpinned by rigorous scientific evidence to drive meaningful change. The inability of predatory journals to provide a platform for such robust research significantly hampers the potential for scientific discoveries to contribute to societal advancement.
Exacerbation of Academic Performance Pressures The emphasis on quantitative metrics, such as the number of publications, as a measure of academic success exacerbates the issue of predatory publishing. Many institutions prioritize publication counts over the quality of research output, leading researchers, especially early-career scholars, to succumb to the lure of predatory journals (Pyne, 2017). This practice not only diminishes the credibility of individual researchers but also taints the reputation of the institutions they represent.
Moreover, the academic evaluation systems in some countries incentivize publishing in journals with minimal scrutiny, further entrenching this damaging practice. For instance, Xia et al. (2015) observed that researchers in developing nations often face immense pressure to publish in international journals, making them particularly vulnerable to predatory publishers.
Recommendations for Mitigating the Impact To combat the adverse effects of predatory publishing, systemic reforms are necessary. First, academic institutions should adopt evaluation metrics that prioritize the quality and impact of research rather than merely counting publications. Second, researchers should be provided with training on how to identify predatory journals and the importance of ethical publishing practices. Third, funding agencies and policymakers must mandate that research outputs stemming from funded projects be published in reputable journals. Lastly, increased collaboration between global academic communities can help foster a collective effort to eliminate predatory publishing.
The inclination towards publishing in predatory journals poses a significant threat to the quality of research and its ability to effect societal change. By undermining research integrity, misguiding policy and practice, and exacerbating academic pressures, predatory publishing diminishes the potential of science to address global challenges effectively. Addressing this issue requires a concerted effort from researchers, institutions, and policymakers to promote ethical publishing practices and prioritize research quality over quantity.
CHALLENGES IN PUBLISHING IN REPUTABLE JOURNALS
Several factors contribute to the challenges faced by Indian PhD scholars in publishing in reputable journals. These include inadequate research training, limited access to resources, and a lack of mentorship. Additionally, systemic issues such as the UGC's emphasis on publication numbers for academic advancement incentivize scholars to opt for easier publication routes, often leading them to predatory journals
Nature
Publishing in reputable journals is a significant milestone for PhD scholars, serving as a testament to the quality and impact of their research. However, Indian PhD scholars encounter several challenges in this endeavor, including inadequate research training, limited access to resources, lack of mentorship, and systemic issues such as the emphasis on publication numbers for academic advancement.
Inadequate Research Training Many Indian PhD scholars begin their doctoral journeys without comprehensive training in research methodologies. This gap can lead to difficulties in designing robust studies, analyzing data effectively, and presenting findings compellingly, all of which are crucial for meeting the stringent standards of reputable journals. The absence of structured training programs exacerbates this issue, leaving scholars underprepared for the rigors of academic publishing.
Limited Access to Resources Access to contemporary research materials, advanced laboratory facilities, and up-to-date journals is often restricted in many Indian academic institutions. This limitation hampers scholars' ability to conduct cutting-edge research and engage with the latest developments in their fields. Consequently, their work may not meet the expectations of high-impact journals, which prioritize novel and well-supported findings.
Lack of Mentorship Effective mentorship is vital for guiding PhD scholars through the complexities of research and publication. In India, the mentor-to-student ratio is frequently imbalanced, resulting in insufficient personalized guidance. Without experienced mentors to provide feedback and support, scholars may struggle to navigate the publication process, from manuscript preparation to responding to peer reviews.
Systemic Issues and the UGC's Emphasis on Publication Numbers The University Grants Commission (UGC) of India has traditionally emphasized the quantity of publications as a criterion for academic advancement. This policy inadvertently incentivizes scholars to pursue easier publication routes, often leading them to predatory journals—outlets that charge fees without providing legitimate peer review or editorial services. Such practices undermine the quality of academic work and tarnish the reputation of Indian research on the global stage. Recognizing this issue, the UGC has recently revised its guidelines, removing the mandatory requirement for PhD scholars to publish in peer-reviewed journals before submitting their theses. This change aims to reduce the pressure to publish in substandard journals and encourage a focus on research quality over quantity (The Hindu).
Predatory Journals and Their Impact The proliferation of predatory journals in India has been a significant concern. These journals exploit the 'publish or perish' mentality by offering quick publication without proper peer review, often for a fee. Scholars, driven by the need to fulfill publication requirements, may resort to these outlets, compromising the integrity of their research. A report highlighted that Indian PhD scholars and professors are increasingly paying to publish in such deceptive journals, perpetuating a cycle of low-quality research dissemination (The Print).
Recent Policy Changes In response to these challenges, the UGC has implemented policy changes to improve the quality of doctoral education and research in India. Notably, the UGC has removed the mandatory requirement for PhD scholars to publish research papers before submitting their theses. This move is intended to alleviate the pressure to publish in predatory journals and to shift the focus towards the quality of research rather than the quantity of publications (The Hindu).
Indian PhD scholars face multifaceted challenges in publishing in reputable journals, stemming from inadequate training, resource limitations, lack of mentorship, and systemic pressures. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive approach, including enhancing research training programs, improving access to resources, fostering effective mentorship, and reforming academic evaluation criteria to prioritize research quality over quantity. Such measures will better equip scholars to contribute meaningfully to the global academic community.
CONCLUSION
The analysis reveals deep-rooted challenges in Indian doctoral research within humanities and social sciences that require urgent attention. The predominance of descriptive research, coupled with the alarming rise in predatory publishing practices, significantly undermines the quality and impact of doctoral studies. The removal of mandatory publication requirements by the UGC represents a positive step, but more comprehensive reforms are needed. These should include restructuring academic evaluation systems to prioritize research quality over quantity, enhancing research methodology training programs, improving access to resources, and strengthening mentorship frameworks. Furthermore, establishing robust peer-review mechanisms and promoting ethical publishing practices are crucial for elevating Indian doctoral research to international standards. Only through such systematic changes can the academic community ensure that doctoral research meaningfully contributes to societal development and global knowledge creation. Future efforts should focus on implementing these reforms while fostering a research culture that values rigorous analysis, theoretical innovation, and practical applicability.
REFERENCES
Lakhotia, S. C. (2017). Predatory journals and academic pollution. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 83. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2017/49141
Patwardhan, B., & Lakhotia, S. C. (2018). Critical analysis of the UGC-approved list of journals. Current Science, 114(6), 1270-1274.
Shen, C., & Björk, B. C. (2015). 'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 230.
Lakhotia, S. C. (2017). Predatory journals and academic pollution. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 83. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2017/49141
Das, R. K., & Singha, A. (2024). Innovative learning paths: A theoretical approach to manpower training for library professionals in a technology-driven environment. EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra15563
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati. (2024). PhD scholars. Department of Design. Retrieved from https://iitg.ac.in/drf/phdScholar.php
Beall, J. (2017). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., ... & Shea, B. J. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a
Pyne, D. (2017). The rewards of predatory publications at a small business school. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 48(3), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.3.137
Shen, C., & Björk, B. C. (2015). 'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
Smolčić, V. S. (2014). Salami publication: Definitions and examples. Biochemia Medica, 24(3), 337-345. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.034
Strielkowski, W. (2020). Predatory journals: Beall’s List and alternative strategies for its discontinuation. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09696-1
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in "predatory" journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406-1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
Prasad, R. (2015, October 25). Fake journals: ‘Make in India’ gone wrong. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/fake-journals-make-in-india-gone-wrong/article7800231.ece
Press Trust of India. (2016, December 18). Most Indian college research appears in "predatory" journals. Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/most-indian-college-research-appears-in-predatory-journals-116121800218_1.html
Press Trust of India. (2017, September 7). India top contributor of research in bogus journals. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/pti-feed/story/india-top-contributor-of-research-in-bogus-journals-1039731-2017-09-07
Prasad, R. (2018, March 23). 88% of journals in UGC's white list are predatory, finds study. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/dubious-journals-abound/article23325569.ece
Vaidyanathan, G. (2019, June 13). No paper, no PhD? India rethinks graduate student policy. Nature. Retrieved from
NDTV. (2019, June 17). 'Avoid Publication In Predatory Or Dubious Journals': UGC To Academia. Retrieved from https://www.ndtv.com/education/avoid-publication-in-predatory-or-dubious-journals-ugc-to-scholars-2054802
The Hindu Bureau. (2022, November 9). Publishing research papers no longer mandatory for Ph.D. scholars. The Hindu. Retrieved from
ThePrint Staff. (2023, April 26). Indian PhDs, professors are paying to publish in real-sounding, fake journals. It's a racket. ThePrint. Retrieved from
